Business.com Upcoming Events

October 9, 2009

Just wanted to let you know that Business.com will be attending the following events:

  • BtoB’s NetMarketing Breakfast in San Francisco on 10/15
  • OMC Webinar Featuring Ben Hanna – “Top 10 Secrets for BtoB Paid Search & SEO Best Practices to Drive Relevant Traffic and Tangible ROI” 10/27 – sign up here!

Hope to see you there!


VIDEO: How to Measure B2B Online Conversions

August 27, 2009

One area of marketing that remains strong despite the economic downturn is search marketing.   However, as our recent “Unlocking the B2B Web Analytics Black Box” study revealed, there are still major challenges to measuring search marketing success for B2B.  The biggest one: conversion attribution.  “Last click” tools just don’t provide the full story.

Watch my recent interview with WebProNews to learn more about understanding web analytics and the best tools to measure success for B2B.

Ben Hanna Video


Web Site Traffic for the 2009 BtoB Media Power 50

May 18, 2009

Business.com was recently named to BtoB Magazine’s Media Power 50 annual list of the most influential business-to-business marketing vehicles. This is the fourth year in a row that we’ve been named to the list which also includes household (or should I say workplace?) names such as The Wall St. Journal, BusinessWeek, Forbes, CNNMoney and more.

When the BtoB Media Power 50 list is announced, we get another great opportunity to answer the question we frequently hear from B2B advertisers and agencies – how big is Business.com?

The answer is surprising to many, but its a bit more difficult to tell this year because BtoB decided to combine print and online properties into a single entity on the list. For example, The Wall St. Journal print edition and WSJ.com are now reported as one in the list. While this change makes sense, it also makes it difficult to interpret the circulation and web site traffic stats for each of the winners.

So how big is Business.com? The chart below compares the number of unique web site visitors in April, 2009 for each of the BtoB Media Power 50 General Business category members:

2009 BtoB Media Power 50 - General Business category

2009 BtoB Media Power 50 - General Business category

Business.com has more unique monthly visitors than all members of the General Business category except for CNNMoney.com. This comparison is based on quantcast.com estimates for March, 2009.

Surprised? As we often say, Business.com is one of the best kept secrets for reaching a large, targeted audience of active business buyers online. For more information, visit the Business.com Advertising Center or call us at (888) 441-4466 (within the U.S.) or (310) 586-4185.


Improve B2B Conversion Rates by Reducing Buyer Risk

May 4, 2009

Have you ever been absolutely sure that your product or service was the best solution for a particular prospect, only to find out that they chose to go with another vendor? What about that great product comparison whitepaper you developed which generated an amazing number of sales leads but no sales? Or the by-the-book email nurture campaign that just doesn’t perform like it should?

One major reason for these, according to a fascinating new study from Enquiro Research, is that the standard model of business buying as a thorough, rational, step-by-step process just isn’t accurate. Instead, this study of over 3,000 business buyers suggests  that B2B buying is driven largely by attempts to control personal and organizational risks. In other words, according to the authors, “99% of B2B buying is about covering your butt.”

These insights put a  new spin on the drive to improve B2B conversion rates – if business buying is driven more by risk mitigation than rational optimization, what does this mean for landing page content and offers? How can B2B online marketers create the lowest-risk environment for prospects to increase registrations, quote requests or purchases?

In a world where risk protection dominates rational evaluation in the business buying process, the following are important for improving B2B online marketing conversion rates:**

Understand Business Buyer Risk

To reduce business buyer risk and improve conversion rates, its essential to understand the extent to which your company, products/services or offers may be perceived as risky by your target buyers.

Purchase consideration clearly matters – there’s less risk in asking someone to provide their email address for an e-newsletter subscription than there is in a $100,000 purchase. Market position also matters, but its not just your company’s standing in the Fortune 500 or Inc. 5000 that makes a difference. Is your company the dominant player, or just entering the market, in the specific product or service for which you want to improve conversion rates? For example, few would doubt that Google’s “conversion rate” for signing-up new pay-per-click advertisers, where they’re the clear market leader among general search engines, is much higher than their conversion rate for radio advertising in their recently discontinued Audio Ads program.

For those of you marketing low price/low consideration products or services from a dominant, market-leading position, good news! There isn’t likely to be all that much you can do to improve conversion rates by reducing business buyer risk since risk is so low already.

On the other hand, B2B marketers working to establish their offerings in new markets and/or selling higher-consideration purchases may have considerable opportunity to improve conversion rates by addressing business buyer risk factors.

Become an “Approved Vendor” Through Teaser Offers

B2B online marketers struggling to drive conversions of a high consideration product for a relatively new business that hasn’t established a dominant market position are in a very difficult position. Even with a brilliantly conceived and executed marketing program focused on an accurate, rational view of your products’ superiority, quality conversions that lead to sales are still likely to be relatively rare. More often than not, prospects will fall through because they “got a great deal from an existing vendor” or “went with a vendor that’s already approved.”  None of the standard advice about improving conversion rates through better landing page design will put a dent in this issue because its not about making it easy for your prospects to see what they should do and act. Instead, the problem is not being on the approved vendor list in the first place.

So what do you do? Become a champion for a teaser offer (e.g., simplified product, free 30- to 60-day trial, etc.) that lowers the perceived risk of getting started for your target audience. To be an “approved vendor”, whether formally through the AP department or simply through the trust built up via multiple, positive interactions around the teaser offer, gives you a considerable leg up on future business. Its not as simple as landing page design but, if better landing page design was all you needed, you wouldn’t be reading this.

Use Search Marketing to Drive Word-of-Mouth

The Enquiro research suggests that word-of-mouth can be hugely influential during the business buying process, particularly for “blank slate” purchases where the buyer/company has no prior experience with purchasing that type of product or service. While search marketing is an extremely powerful tool for getting your message in front of business people searching for solutions, B2B search marketing tends to focus much more on driving prospects to whitepaper or webinar registration pages, or to ecommerce sites, than driving people to view and participate in conversations about a company’s products or services (for an exception, see Office Depot’s success incorporating customer reviews into paid search campaigns).

If your target buyers see your solution as moderately to highly risky, there’s reason to believe that alllocating  a portion of the search marketing budget toward driving more online and offline word-of-mouth activity will positively impact conversion rates. While it may not happen overnight, fueling the conversation can reduce the perceived risk of conversion.

Address Buyer Risk in Your B2B Demand Gen Program

One of the major challenges in driving online conversions or creating a more effective B2B demand gen programs is personalization – making each landing page, e-newsletter or offer as relevant as possible to the target prospect – and addressing business buyer risk gives us another opportunity to make demand gen practices more personally relevant. To improve conversions by reducing business buyer risk, you might consider the following changes to your demand generation program:

  • Match prospects with happy customers that came from similar “risk” profiles – rather than matching a “blank slate” prospect with a reference customer that’s been with you for 20 years, have them talk with customer that made their “blank slate” purchase with you within the last couple years. Also, consider getting references from multiple people involved with the decision to purchase your product or service, and matching prospects with references at their same job level and role in the purchasing process.
  • Consider linking to customer reviews or forum conversations from your conversion pages – giving prospects more than one option sounds like landing page heresy, but this may not be the case for higher consideration purchases and less established brands. If visitors to your landing page have any doubts at all about converting, at least take them to content that reduce the perceived riskiness of converting.
  • If you sell primarily to large companies, get creative with landing page technology-  consider doing a reverse IP lookup on visitors to your landing pages, identifying the company and serving a dynamic content block on the page indicating that your company is already an approved vendor for the visitor’s company (if you are). Sounds creepy? Possibly for very early stage offers, but less so when a prospect visits for detailed spec sheets or to request a quote. NOTE: this won’t work well for small companies.

 

What do you think?  What would you do to improve conversion rates by reducing buyer risk?

For more background, you can download the first whitepaper from Enquiro’s new business buying study, “Mapping the BuyerSphere“, from the Enquiro web site.

**These recommendations, and many more, are part of  Business.com’s presentation ”Improving Search Marketing ROI During a Recession: Top 10 Insider Tips,” during the Online Marketing Summit 14-city Regional Whistle Stop Tour from May 5th through July 2nd, 2009. For a 20% discount on OMS registration from Business.com, use discount code business.com20.


Which Online Marketing Agencies will Survive the Recession?

April 28, 2009

Among the client pitches, creative brainstorming and status meetings, one thought is never far from mind for anyone working at one of the various flavors of online marketing agencies these days – “Will we survive?”

Its also a pretty important question for their clients since the last thing a marketing director, already struggling with a declining budget and fewer personnel, wants is to have to deal with the disruption of finding a new agency.

I’ve been there before. During the dot.com boom, I ran a small B2B integrated marketing agency in Silicon Valley. Thankfully, through a fortunate confluence of events, we were able to get out of the agency business just before the peak and were spared what seemed to be the complete decimation of high tech marketing during the early 2000’s. But other agencies weren’t so lucky and a lot of great people lost the opportunity to do what they loved most – find innovative, effective ways to communicate the value of products and services to buyers.

Sean Carton, chief strategy officer at Baltimore, MD web and communications design firm idfive, recently wrote a great summary of the predicament in which agencies find themselves entitled “The End of Ad Agencies as We Know Them.” (kudos for the wonderfully inflammatory title). Reading this article brought back a number of memories from the dot.com bust for me, just as it did for a number of those commenting on the article. The main question this article poses is:

“Do we really need advertising agencies anymore? Are we witnessing the great “reboot” of the advertising industry hastened (but not caused) by the current recession?”

The answer to the first question is yes, we absolutely do – there will always be a need for outside specialists to do what a company cannot (or should not) do internally, and this is particularly important in the creative and technical services domains where talent is both scarce and expensive. Along these lines, Mr. Carton certainly is not predicting the demise of either advertising or agencies. Rather, he feels the recession will drive a trend toward smaller agencies more concentrated on the following areas:

  • Strategy
  • Account/project management
  • Creative leadership (but not execution)
  • Media strategy (but not the actual planning & buying)

In this new world, according to Mr. Carton, agencies will be built with the purpose of providing high-level strategic guidance that clients need in a media-chaotic environment. These agencies will expand or contract as needed or will explore radical solutions to get work done for less money. In essence, the monolithic agency concept crumbles in favor of smaller, more nimble, focused, strategic agencies or consultants linked together via the (free) collaboration and social networking tools now available.

This vision is, as they say, “old wine in new bottles” (something Mr. Carton admits, with the exception that the collaboration/social networking tools now make this vision more possible than it was in the past). I see things a bit differently:

1) Large agencies make the best stories during economic downturns, so its no wonder people frequently predict the demise of the large agency model -  Large agencies typically work with large, well-known clients, both of which get a lot more press and public attention during good times or bad. When times get tough, clients cut back which forces an agency to contract, cut costs and the whole process draws much more public attention than the same challenges faced by smaller agencies or consultants. Let’s not fall into the “base rate fallacy” where people judge more visible events to be more common, even if that’s not the case.

2)  Both large and small online marketing agencies are hurting and facing changes to their business models - Online marketing is certainly faring better than offline, and drawing increasing budget from traditional marketing, but agencies large and small rely on the health of their clients to grow and thrive. A broad recession like this one doesn’t discriminate by company size.

3) The consumer and client backlash against agencies has more to do with the times than inherently inefficient practices – We know we’re in La-La Land when 66% of US Internet users in a recent Harris poll indicate that agencies are at least partly to blame for the current economic crisis.

4) The ability to collaborate isn’t an impediment to agency survival, strategy is – Collaboration and social networking tools have great potential to facilitate communications among dispersed experts, but are small agencies that use these tools inherently better off than larger agencies with more face-to-face collaboration in a central office? I’d argue that its not the tools, but the strategy behind the agency that matters. Agency personnel can collaborate like crazy on a project that’s still a horrible disaster for a client if the right focus on client needs, KPIs or creative standards aren’t enforced.

5) Which online marketing agencies will survive this recession? The ones keeping a laser focus on understanding and meeting changing client needs- Again, I don’t think this is a large agency or small agency issue. Its a strategic priorities issue. Clients are under amazing pressure to drive results with fewer resources. Under pressure, people’s focus tends to narrow – they become much more concerned about what’s happening today versus their long-term strategic plan, and also focus more on what they know best. In this environment, agencies must choose whether they or their clients will be most affected by this pressure. Will the agency take the view of their clients and adapt to changing client needs, even if this is incredibly uncomfortable at times? Or will the agency give in to their own pressure and fight back in the face of changing client requests, clinging rigidly to pre-recession practices? Agencies that put the client first may experience more short-term pain but are likely to be the big winners from these trying times.

Some concluding recommendations for online marketing agencies:

Keep serving the clients’ stated, immediate goals as your #1 strategic priority.  It’s easy to get caught in the hype of all the new digital mediums and ad channels, risky creative, etc. This is no time to strongly argue that your clients should “trust us, we’re the experts.”  Understand what clients really want, insist on knowing how this will be measured (one area in which to dig in your heels) and execute efficiently.

Stick to your knitting - Its (very) tempting to say “yes, we can do that” to a client interested in a marketing channel, such as social media, where your agency doesn’t have much experience or expertise. With clients under considerable pressure to deliver results, this is not a great time to learn on the clients’ dime, so to speak. Instead, tap into talented experts across a wide range of B2B marketing domains who suddenly find themselves out of work (or underutilized). When the economy turns up, you may or may not choose to bring these new skills into your agency – as I said, I don’t believe that the smaller, focused agency described by Mr. Carton is inherently better – but the need to consistently deliver great results to clients today should drive outsourcing.

Crow about your true expertise like there’s no tomorrow. What is your agency really, really good at doing for clients that you have the case studies and stats to back up? Not what you think you’re good at, but where have you really driven great results? Clients want solutions. If their existing agency isn’t delivering, they’re going to be searching online, talking to their friends/colleagues, sending RFPs out via Twitter and otherwise trying to find an expert as quickly as possible. Make sure your agency is found, and make sure what prospective clients find is tangible examples where you’ve delivered results, not just unsubstantiated assertions about what you can do.

In summary, the online marketing agency that’s fit to survive in today’s economy isn’t going to be the one that offers all forms of advertising (or even digital advertising for that matter), the latest and the greatest innovations in advertising, or even the one that’s the epitome of the small, specialized, nimble agency described by Mr. Carton. Its the online marketing agency that makes itself truly indispensable for meeting their clients’ goals TODAY, and the one that can demonstrate this success in a concrete way.